The Abrahamic legacy
Everyone wants to do things of earthshaking importance. So, religions come in to provide the do-big delusion on demand. Following the demand-and-supply mechanism, in purely mercantile fashion, literalist religiosity flourishes to produce nothing but kidnapping, assassination, airline hijacking, suicide bombing, mass murder, inquisitions, crusades, anti-Semitism, 9/11 and Mumtaz Qadri
At the time when the notable fragment of humanity is imitating Abraham’s sacrifice, let us dig deeper into his legacy. By digging deeper into Abrahamic legacy, I mean making it known, a little less mysterious, baffling and intimidating. By this rethinking, we will determine whether Abrahamic legacy is creation of healthy minded religious virtuous souls or a tool for pathologically diseased, unbalanced psychotic crooks who enslave people and make hell for heaven.
Abraham, the Hebrew patriarch and father of great monotheistic religions made an awkward move in a defining era in of world history called axial age. He lifted an insignificant tribal deity El and elevated it to the status of one true God. The sooner El was raised to the status of full-fledged God; He came to life.
“I would name you Yahweh and make you the only true God of my descendants”. The patriarch spoke to Him.
Yahweh was a demanding God. And every time our patriarch would satisfy His demand, He would become more challenging and the patriarch, some way or other, had to fulfil demands. Yahweh made him left Ur, in Mesopotamia, to sow his “seed” as He promised him to inherit the land.
Contemporary scholarship calls the period from 800 to 200 BC axial age for an interesting characteristic of this period. For, it was the period when, without any obvious transmission of ideas from one civilization to another, humankind was revolutionizing its thinking all across the globe. During this age major eastern religions, Taoism, Confucianism in China and Buddhism, Samkhya System and Jainism in ancient India were emphasizing materialist determinism in life cycle. In the same period, in China and India, secular trends of thought emerged. Ancient Indian seculars like Uddalaka and Makkalai and ancient Chinese humanists like Yang Chu, Hsu”-tzu, and Wang Chong in 3rd and 4th centuries B.C. had began to question God who interferes with human affairs. In the same period, Greek rationalism was flourishing in Athens.
But our patriarch, in the same period, crafts an ever testing God who was more interested in human affairs than Godly acts. Yahweh, this new God, made several demands but two of them were of onerous urgency: killing his son in name of God and destroying the very temple wherefrom He was lifted. The son, however, was changed with a ram but pagan hunting became a constant theme of the religion he founded.
So far story of son-and-ram is concerned; some notable anthropologists and historians say that this sacrifice symbolically represents a shift in rituals when human sacrifice was replaced with that of animal. However, on the other hand, we note, by digging somewhat deeper, that religious violence also tends to put greater emphasis on the symbolic part of the terrorist acts.
However, for critics of Abrahamic faiths, God’s abovementioned demands are at the very roots of subsequent infidel-branding, land-grabbing and killing which appears, time and again, as an essential motif of Abrahamic brand of monotheism. Hebrew Scriptures reveal that God, crafted by our patriarch, would no longer bear His ex counterparts and higher-ups being worshipped and offered services and sacrifices.
Do not worship any other god, for the LORD, whose name is Jealous, is a jealous God (Exodus 34:14).
We can quote thousands of passages, from Hebrew bible, with reference to God expressing this jealousy, supporting violence and commanding to kill humans. For example, here is King James Version; of 21st Century which translates God’s central command in this way:
“And when the LORD thy God shall deliver them before thee, thou shalt smite them and utterly destroy them. Thou shalt make no covenant with them nor show mercy any unto them” (Deuteronomy 7:1-2).
Following this divine command, as Torah states, Israelites devastated entire ethnic groups, killed all Amalekites including women and innocent children (1 Samuel 15:1-20 ).
Apologists believe these accounts to be metaphorical. If we accept their claim, a question arises that God, the omniscient, should know well that majority of human population is essentially literalist and have strong tendency to concretize the metaphors or symbols. Wasn’t God a taking a grave and heartless risk by camouflaging His message in metaphorical language?
If science, realizing this problem, can evolve a universal scientific language why not God who knows better according to the phrase we use many times a day? Has God, as a conscious craftsman been trying to hide His message of love behind violent words for He too was left with no other way, like James Joyce, to gain immortality?
Here, I am not denying the importance of symbol but, when religionists try to prove their religion to be scientific, they become literalists. When literalism is criticised on above grounds, they insist on symbolic interpretation.
They, however, do not realize that the very nature of symbol is its fluidity, its watery disposition, its suppleness and so, in most cases, translation and explanation evaporate its very essence as symbol, like language, it carries its culture with it and it demands a whole range of inalienable cognitive associations.
Moreover, symbol is not for all. Symbol can only be understood by great artists, poets, and creative geniuses. If very nature of scriptures is symbolic; then they should neither be translated nor interpreted because translation and interpretation concretize the symbols.
But everyone wants to do things of earthshaking importance. So, religions come in to provide the do-big delusion on demand. Following the demand-and-supply mechanism, in purely mercantile fashion, literalist religiosity flourishes to produce nothing but kidnapping, assassination, airline hijacking, suicide bombing, mass murder, inquisitions, crusades, anti-Semitism, 9/11 and Mumtaz Qadri.
One can ask that religion and violence are compatible but they are not identical. That is true but non-religious violence can easily be declared as unfair and punishable, even by insiders, but in religious violence, one feels and if one was channelled by higher forces and so, violence is done with the sense of righteousness as a Godly act.
Moreover, as we have already seen, scriptures of Abrahamic lineage command smiting, destruction, showing no mercy to enemies of God, slaying the idolaters after sacred months, taking them captives, besieging and preparing to ambush (verse of sword); the legacy of our common patriarch becomes even more dangerous when we see that the religions, he fathers to, are innately exclusivists and inevitably encourage violence against those who are branded outsiders. Each of the Abrahamic religion claims exclusive divine favour and creates a sense of unaccommodating righteousness and superiority which may cause nothing more than hostility.
When faith-based exclusivism is owned by a state; the net result of this unsafe union is nothing but magnified havoc. In religious states, huge armies of mortal youth are kept to fight eternal God’s battles and perform His revenge.
All this happens under the nose of the mobs sniffing blasphemy but, in this case, they are not programmed to smell their own masters. If some state or institution declares it’s very rationale to be fighting God’s battles and performing His revenge the state or certain institute, in other words, is saying that God is incapable of fighting His own battles and He would be in great trouble if we would not go for His help.
It is obvious that if we continue to contribute to the legacy of destruction; the time of global extinction will get closer and closer.
As we have seen, Abrahamic faiths, right from the axial age to the day, have been used as superstition-based methods cunningly devised for keeping people subservient and others terrorized. Opportunist politicians and dictators have used them to manufacture popular consent to extend their powers, mullahs, with the superstitious pulls of religions, have managed to enslave humanity—and see the atrociousness of their triumph—people, petrified in slavery, are kissing and worshipping their chains and shackles!
![]() |
Jamshed Iqbal is a media critic, freelance writer & peace activist. |





Comments
Farhat Zubair sahib has rightly identified your throwaway remark about the era in which you are trying to fix Abraham in. Hebraic tradition had much developed even by the time of King David in the 10th century B.C.
You also have liberally criticized these Christian and Judaic scriptures because you know they will not come to your throat. Your recurrent theme is that Abrahamic faiths instigate killing, land grabbing and war. I would suggest, please read the church history and even the life of Jesus Christ who became a sacrifice rather than advocating killing of people. He titled as Lamb of God himself became a sacrifice and said in Matthew 26:52 “Put your sword back in its place for all who draw the sword will die by the sword”. Read about the early Christianity and quote anything like this. Don’t you think Christianity is also an Abrahamic faith?
All what pseudo-liberals can recall about Christianity are the Crusades, without knowing/quoting their historical context. The Holy Land, what is now Israel, is Mecca for Jews and Christians. Crusades were for reconquest/retaking of the Holy Land. Muslims hate even presence of American boots on Arabian Peninsula. So was the very idea of Christians to take back their Holy Land. I don’t know if you can call it land grabbing. You should also be able to appreciate the fact that the Christians came up with the idea of Holy War about four hundred years after the Islamic conquest began. Pope Urban II ordered the First Crusade in 1095 while the Jerusalem was taken by the Muslims in 638. At the same time, obviously, there were several unjust acts in the Crusades which no sensible human can overlook, deny, or condone, let alone appreciate them. However, the Crusades primarily began for retaking of the Hold Land and not for brutal acts named by Jamshed sahib.
Lastly, please know that only Abraham, Isaac and Jacob are called patriarchs. None of them fought for capturing the land. Abraham fought a battle to rescue a king. Jacob's sons killed the people of Shechem after their sister was raped. Even Moses did not fight for the land. It was Joshua who fought. Abraham and Joshua and more than four centuries apart.
Cathay zubair did give some fruit for thought but I think he missed the point.
But I would like to present my views:
Firstly in your article you state that Abrham made the move from Chaldea (Ur near modern day Kuwait) to the promised land sometimes near 800 BC. No sir I disagree it can be historically proved that 800 BC was the age of the decline of the lineage of King Solomon who came on world scene almost a thousand years after Abraham.
It was the time when the nation of Israel had split into two nations.
Abraham according to the Bible made his sojourn sometime 2000 years BC into the promised land.
You mention El as being a God of Abraham but in the Bible its always LORD that is mentioned, true the LORD calls himself a jealous God but that was written almost 400 years after Abraham in the wilderness of Mt Sinai in Arabia.
We read something quite different this as the God of Abraham urges him to make the move "Now the LORD had said unto Abram Get thee out of thy country and from thy kindred....and I will make of thee a great nation....and in thee shall all families of the earth be blessed." The nations were not to bless themselves as Abram's children will subjugate and enslave and exploit them but on the contrary the blessing was to be spiritual.
Quite a contrast to the tone of our Allah the benevolent don't you agree?
True at the time of Moses God instructed them to kill all the Canaanites and live in their cities but after that there were to be no expansion policy such as the empires of Egypt Assyria Babylon Persia Greece Rome and later on Islam and Anglo American world powers!
"And he said unto Abram, Know of a surety that thy seed shall be a stranger in a land that is not theirs, and shall serve them: and they shall afflict them four hundred years." And also that nation whom they will serve will I judge and afterward they shall they come out with great substance......
But in the fourth generation they shall come hither again: for the iniquity of the Amorites is not yet full."
Their boundaries were defined and all through the almost thousand years starting from Judges till the last of their King Hezekiah in 607BCE, the Israelites followed no expansions of their territories, it was a commandment from God that they would not be given any other land except what was allotted to them "In the same day the LORD made a covenant with Abram, saying Unto your thy seed have I given this land from the river of Egypt to unto the great river Euphrates."
"And command thou the people, saying, Ye are to pass through the coast of your brethren the children of Esau, which dwell in Seir; and they shall be afraid of you: take ye good heed unto yourselves therefore:
Meddle not with them; for I will not give you of their land, no, not so much as a foot breadth; because I have given mount Seir unto Esau for a possession.
Ye shall buy meat of them for money, that ye may eat; and ye shall also buy water of them for money, that ye may drink.
For the LORD thy God hath blessed thee in all the works of thy hand: he knoweth thy walking through this great wilderness: these forty years the LORD thy God hath been with thee; thou hast lacked nothing.
And when we passed by from our brethren the children of Esau, which dwelt in Seir, through the way of the plain from Elath, and from Eziongaber, we turned and passed by the way of the wilderness of Moab.
And the LORD said unto me, Distress not the Moabites, neither contend with them in battle: for I will not give thee of their land for a possession; because I have given Ar unto the children of Lot for a possession. The Emims dwelt therein in times past, a people great, and many, and tall, as the Anakims;
Which also were accounted giants, as the Anakims; but the Moabites called them Emims.
The Horims also dwelt in Seir beforetime; but the children of Esau succeeded them, when they had destroyed them from before them, and dwelt in their stead; as Israel did unto the land of his possession, which the LORD gave unto them. Deutronomy 2:4-12
Children of Esau who was the brother of Jacob son of Isaac son of Abraham. So there were others who were sons of Abrham who began to dwell in the land of Cannan as God promised including Ishmael son of Abrham.
But Isreal was never an expansionist nation all through its existence of a more than a thousand years it tried to keep its territories against enemy nations all around jsut as today!
My argument is that Yahweh the God of Abram and the sons of Israel were never viscious cut throats such as Muslims have always been and never greedy and lusty for power as the Western nations! The God of Islam is not the same God as that of the Jews.
Allah was is the very god that Abraham left in Ur Sin The Moon God of Chaldea he has supplanted Yahweh’s position and falsely claims to be the god of Abraham and true to his blood thirstiness till today he is shedding innocent blood.
The prophets of Israel were an example in moral purity, listen to Micah speak in behalf of Yahweh:
Hear ye now what the LORD saith; Arise, contend thou before the mountains, and let the hills hear thy voice.
Hear ye, O mountains, the LORD's controversy, and ye strong foundations of the earth: for the LORD hath a controversy with his people, and he will plead with Israel.
O my people, what have I done unto thee? and wherein have I wearied thee? testify against me.
For I brought thee up out of the land of Egypt, and redeemed thee out of the house of servants; and I sent before thee Moses, Aaron, and Miriam.
O my people, remember now what Balak king of Moab consulted, and what Balaam the son of Beor answered him from Shittim unto Gilgal; that ye may know the righteousness of the LORD.
Wherewith shall I come before the LORD, and bow myself before the high God? shall I come before him with burnt offerings, with calves of a year old?
Will the LORD be pleased with thousands of rams, or with ten thousands of rivers of oil? shall I give my firstborn for my transgression, the fruit of my body for the sin of my soul?
He hath shewed thee, O man, what is good; and what doth the LORD require of thee, but to do justly, and to love mercy, and to walk humbly with thy God? Micah 6:1-8
It is easy to make sweeping statements about people in historical times, but if you really want to comment honestly about Bible personages Bible is a historical document Jamshed sb I request you to actually read the whole book and don't just take the words of the atheistic western critics of Bible at face value!
Thank you